Baseball America Week 12 Stock Report vs. 05/16 Boyd’s World & 05/16 Warren Nolan RPI with Boyd’s World Top 8 & Top 16 RPI Needs

Teams in bold square box were projected Top 8 by Baseball America Week 12 Stock Report, Teams in non-bold square box projected Regional Hosts by Baseball America Week 12 Stock Report. Teams in blue shading were teams “on the bubble” for being a Top 8 seed by Baseball America Week 12 Stock Report.
—
Baseball America Week 12 Stock Report vs. 05/16 Baseball America Top 25 Ranking, 05/16 Perfect Game Top 25 Ranking, 05/16 Collegiate Baseball Top 30 Ranking & 05/16 ESPN/USA Today Coaches Poll Ranking

Teams in bold square box were projected Top 8 by Baseball America Week 12 Stock Report, Teams in non-bold square box projected Regional Hosts by Baseball America Week 12 Stock Report. Teams in blue shading were teams “on the bubble” for being a Top 8 seed by Baseball America Week 12 Stock Report.
—
Baseball America Week 12 Stock Report vs. 05/16 Boyd’s World RPI, 05/16 Warren Nolan RPI & 05/16 Poll Rankings

—
Since the Week 12 Stock Report came out, Stetson dropped a series and has fallen out of the top 16 in the RPI & rankings, and Oklahoma State dropped a series to Baylor which should all but eliminate them from the Ark-homa-tex hosting race. Arkansas dropped a close series to South Carolina which hurts them from a resume standpoint (more on this in a bit), but probably doesn’t remove them from TCU’s regional hosting competition. Southern Miss also dropped their series to Houston.
I’ve expanded the scope of this week’s RPI analysis to look at all hosting candidates and not just the local TCU competition, because finding a 4th regional in Ark-homa-tex becomes a little more believable thanks to the potential elimination of Stetson and possibly even Southern Miss from hosting consideration. I’ve also expanded the scope of the analysis to look at the discrepancies between Boyd Nation’s RPI & Warren Nolan’s RPI, which unfortunately notes a considerable difference for the Horned Frogs. Finally, in the second table and graph I’ve added the 4 major college baseball polls referenced by most to illustrate the reference point that may be just convincing enough to land a Fort Worth regional – perhaps over Rice and even Oklahoma.
Aaron Fitt made a reference in this week’s Top 25 chat that “the committee doesn’t care where we have teams ranked” and I’ll echo that sentiment and remind everyone that no matter how much agreement you see across regional projections – prepare yourself for head-scratchers come selection Monday. There is going to be some inclusion or exclusion that is going to send people into a fit of rage on a message board somewhere, and considering the local competition for hosting spots we already know for a fact that at least one of these Ark-homa-tex teams are going to get sent packing.
The point I kept coming back to as I sat at Lupton this weekend is how the polls are not just in the Horned Frogs’ favor over their nearby competion – they’re overwhelmingly in their favor. The Frogs’ lowest ranking is 10th – in a world where objective metrics (RPI) don’t exist, the Frogs are bubble team for a National Seed. I point this out not to say that the committee is going to be influenced by these polls, but to moreso represent what seems to be the closest thing one can find to a “consensus” when it comes to a public perception of a team’s strength. The perception exists out there that the Horned Frogs are a top 10 team and have played at that level all season (regardless if this is actually the truth). Provided the Frogs win the New Mexico series and win the Mountain West tournament (not taking the ease of these accomplishments for granted, just using that assumption for this particular discussion) – I think the committee gives TCU a Fort Worth Regional based on their resume of quality wins, record against the Big 12, and a “justified” RPI that was weakened by a poor year in the Mountain West in which the next best team is 54th (UNLV). If TCU proves they are demonstrably better than their conference – and by winning the regular season & conference tournaments, I believe that would satisfy this position – I think the committee will cut TCU some slack on their RPI ranking if it ends up being in the 16 to 24 range. If the committee doesn’t come to this type of conclusion for the Horned Frogs, then my best guess is that they exhausted the extent of their RPI-welfare on the incredibly weak ranking of Oregon State.
My best projection of the 8/16 is as follows, but I want to stress this is not what I necessarily think should happen – this is what I have a feeling is going to happen:
Top 8:
Virginia
South Carolina
Florida
Oregon State
Texas
Arizona State
Florida State
Texas A&M (more on this in a minute)
Regional Hosts
Vanderbilt
North Carolina
Georgia Tech
Cal State Fullerton
TCU
Oklahoma
Clemson
Rice -or- Southern Miss
“Justification”:
- Unless Vandy wins the SEC Tournament, I think they’re going to be gun-shy about giving the SEC East 3 Top 8 Seeds.
- I don’t think the committee is going to be able to stay immune to how incredibly ACC-happy the RPI is this year, and the result is the 5 host spots you see here.
- Because a split-title of the Big XII between A&M & Texas is possible, I think we’re going to have a head-scratcher about how strong the committee is going to be on the Big XII. It wouldn’t be the first time. On the heels of the justification that each of these teams (Texas & A&M) are top 8 seeds, I think you’ll see Oklahoma get a regional host as well, and also a propping-up of TCU’s resume based on their strong record against the Big XII.
The biggest flaw of my “i’m just guessin’” logic displayed above is this – should Rice take Conference USA from Southern Miss next weekend, that actually means that there are an improbable 5 regional hosts between Texas, A&M, Oklahoma, TCU & Rice. Oklahoma gets propped up by the perception of a strong conference. Rice gets propped up by an “undeniable” RPI & Conference USA champ, & TCU gets propped up on the perception of being top 10 and the Mountain West champ. I think Arkansas gets left out (provided they do not win the SEC tournament) based on the fact that they’ve lost 6 weekend series, and a committee that gives less “empowerment” to the loaded SEC dialogue that you read in every outlet on college baseball. In other words, your pissed-off fanbase come selection Monday are going to be SEC fans who don’t understand how the Big XII manages to carry the same reputation as them. It’s just my hunch – I just see it coming.
Each year the committee gets tasked with “regionalizing” the Regionals, but the reality of available seeds generally means that something has to give – and be prepared to see lots of Pac 10 teams across this litany of potential Texas regionals. And in 2011, I guess I see the potential for the committee to “give” on the geographic requirement (at least to the point of allowing up to 5 regionals in Ark-homa-tex), in order to not face an angry Monday conference call demanding to know how College World Series alumni TCU or Oklahoma – who have had regular seasons essentially as strong as the prior season, where they were also hosts. But make no mistake about it – there is a wealth of acceptable hosts with 3 to 6 hours’ drive of Fort Worth, and unless the committee is willing to bend on their geographic limits, one of these deserving teams is going to be a 2-seed somewhere. If Rice wins Conference USA – I’d say that the Frogs are standing on the shakiest ground of all, by just not having the RPI in their favor.
It’s been a pretty heartburn-inducing year for the Lupton faithful, and in a way I guess it only makes sense that like so many games we’ve seen the Frogs in this year, it’s coming down to the wire on whether the Frogs are going to get the benefit of Lupton in June like they have for the past two years. The late-season emergence of the back-end rotation guys of Mitchell, Miller & even Frey genuinely means that the Frogs can make it out of any Regional, even if they find themselves in the losers’ bracket. If the return of a healthy Purke (assuming Winkler is also full-strength) means that another of those 3 who stepped up for TCU against Utah can be moved to middle relief, so that Schlossnagle’s only option is not just Appleby before handing the lead to suddenly-closer Crichton, then the Frogs will genuinely have the tools to even make it back to Omaha.
Elsewhere in Warren Nolan-related Heartburn…

The confidence of the Dallas Baptist Patriots has to be sky-high after doing what they were supposed-to (and desperately needed-to) by taking 4 of 4 from Alcorn State after winning their midweek test against Stephen F. Austin. The Patriots have a challenging week ahead of them – Baylor just took the series from Oklahoma State, and a win there may not be entirely critical, but could definitely slam the door shut on any uncertainty on if the Patriots are in. If the Patriots can’t emerge victorious from Waco, then the a series win at home against the RPI-decent UNC-Charlotte (94) becomes a necessity – and a sweep would go a long ways towards helping them relax come selection Monday. I highly recommend making it to Patriot Field this Thurs – Sat for an early taste of must-win playoff baseball.
And one more thing…
So is Kyle Winkler healthy, and did Schlossnagle just shut him down to give him rest? Or at what point will we be able to say that all 3 pitchers of one of the strongest weekend rotations in the last several years of college baseball went down with injury in 2011 after an absolutely dominating 2010?
Admittedly, I’ve held off on a follow-on to my blog-rant regarding the handling of Purke once the injuries to Maxwell & Winkler were announced – if only because yet again, we just don’t know what really is going on. A&M’s life-line John Stilson was similarly shut down last week and is in questionable status for the series of the year between those two teams, and Gerritt Cole – while at least not being injured – hasn’t exactly had a dominant follow-up season either, so pointing the accusatory finger at only Schlossnagle & Mazey probably isn’t completely fair. But I just have to ask – if the story we’re supposed to believe now re: Purke is that he took too much time off this past offseason which resulted in him being out-of-sort when this season rolled around, then why was he handled that way – and would we be wrong to assume a similar connection (poor offseason coaching instruction) to the injuries of Maxwell & now Winkler?* Supposedly all 3 of these guys are eligible to contribute as this season comes to a close – and again, for all I know there’s some sort of plan at work here to limit exposure & overwork under the guise of a systemic injury problem that has taken down 3 of the best pitchers in TCU history. This coaching staff deserves immense credit for the fact that on the last homestand of 2011, TCU had the program depth to start 3 more prize arms and clinch a conference championship while potentially planting the seed of a promising 2012 TCU rotation (though Miller is draft-eligible). But this coaching staff also must be held accountable for the fact that the entire history-making 2010 TCU rotation is still on the team, yet exists in a completely unknown status as this Horned Frog team looks to make postseason magic happen again. If last year’s rotation is to be hailed as a triumph, then there is just no other way to accept their encore, at this point in the season, as anything other than a tragedy.
*This reasoning was described at length during the Oklahoma State Fox Sports broadcast, though I can never tell if this explanation is referring to his blister problem or his shoulder-strength problem. I’ve also read this prognosis on the always-factual message boards & draftnik blogs.